| Added: Feb 16, 2007
From: Vrahno
Duration: 1:57
Entelodons rule.
Channel: Entertainment
Tags: animals bbc beasts chalicotherium dung entelodont hunt hyaenodon mammals prehistoric stuff walking with
Rating: 4.70 (84 ratings) Views: 108643' favoriteCount='114 Comments: 25
nomineZERO Says:
Sep 28, 2008 - "The only difference..."I see you've got the term facts and theory wrong to... But I understand that as some evolutionists explain it wrong to.Well, no theory becomes a fact, cause theories are BASED ON FACTS. You have facts and with them you can come to a theory.Just like the gravitation theory, the relativity theory etc.Your facts cannot be prooven because there aren't any. Your religion is based on belief and on "one" book.
nomineZERO Says:
Sep 28, 2008 - Oh, not to forget, what you mentioned... stars disproove creationism as it shows that the earth can't posibly be 6000 years old."Your knowledge comes...". Actually repeating is what creationists do: repeating the same old book... Scientists use the scientific method. I also often use my own theories on some things but I give a note that it's based on my thinking and not necesarry correct, but what I discuss with you is all already prooven, so I can't do it otherwise than repeat.
nomineZERO Says:
Sep 28, 2008 - I have theories based on facts, you have faith. That's how you should say it... would be better.You need to learn boy... Get to a reasonable scool where they do teach biology as it's supposed to. It'll do you only good.
Spectrum969 Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - DNA simply proves the functions of genes. But lets call that EVO then how is it possible that from a primitive cell something greater can come unless its capabilities were already there? Remember that the human brain works only about 8 to 10% so the functions are there, is only a matter of triggering those capabilities. Its like in music, we are able to hear tones but there is a deeper experience which needs to be developed.
Spectrum969 Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - I get your point, And is interesting how science is able to explain functions of DNA. Those are your facts based on observation. But is not accurate to say EVO is more valid than God. Like I said, you need to prove the bible by looking into other areas not related to science and theres plenty of info, impossible to look into all. EVO is a theory which has no valid argument to say the God concept is BS. So prove it thats all you have to do.
Spectrum969 Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - Exactly, We repeat. But is up to us to either prove what the info is or just blindly believe. I like to test info because like you there are people out there posting theories based on nothing, simply speculations.
Spectrum969 Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - You dont need facts to create theories. What EVO does is mix some facts about DNA and from there makes the whole theory more believable. Faith is a stronger concept. and so far current events keep proving God's prophecies. Dont need to study cells to know the origin of life. IT was GOD is that simple.
nomineZERO Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - You're pointing again at the cell's defense: No it wasn't there, it came up with tons of generations... If it would be true as you said it the cells would be resistant against that cure already at the next or even the same generation... But no, it took some changes. The human brain: well it's true that it's UNUSED but it's still there for thinking... There are some people which can use more than others... You know what's the diference? They remember more...
nomineZERO Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - EVO is one of the most valid theories, and yeah it is based on facts as all the theories are. Otherwise it wouldn't be theories. Evolution was long known but Darwin gave it a kick with his research. And DNA and fossils and such are the facts that support the evolution theory. I don't know why do I have to repeat myself, but it is so. And I don't care about god. you know people would still believe in god, but creationists started to fussle on evolution and to make up things, that's why
nomineZERO Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - people went to look why creationists refuse evolution and the answear is: the begining... Religions simply make up things so people would be satisfied and that they would think they know it all. And that's why they're so proud of their religion, they think they know it all and don't want to get it taken away. But just think a bit of it. the similarities in DNA and many others... Oh and take the intermidiates today: mudhopper, flying squirels, flying foxes, etc.
nomineZERO Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - "how is it possible that from a primitive cell something greater can come unless its capabilities were already there?"Who told you that? You can't get to a theory without facts... It just wouldn't be a theory. I think you're being taken around the finger by someone.
Spectrum969 Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - Dude you are not explaining how is it that something primitive can create something complex? One thing is to develop resistance just like we do. other is to say is EVO.And you explanation about brain function that they remember is a bad answer.THere are people with photographic memory or brains like Tesla or Einstein. We all have the same brains but understanding to get the brain to work more is less understood.
nomineZERO Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - Ahm, well yeah photographic memory and better logic... so what? If you want to compare that with the cell imunity, it's a bad comparement, you were better with comparing the human imunity with cells but, it's still not the same.I can explain you evolution but if you want that then let's go on personal message as I don't like those 500 chars limits... And making so many comments. So send me a personal messege if you want me to explain it.
Spectrum969 Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - True, very true as far as similarities of DNA ill have to actually dig into the subject. I believe might be true because according to the bible we come from the dust of the earth. Now I don't know what other meaning in the hebrew language the word dust has. And I noticed that words are not really defined in the english language. I have to venture to the hebrew language for deeper meaning.
Spectrum969 Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - This is what Im talking about more info to look into. No time for all this crap. We bark at each other man but what do we know really? The world is the one putting info on our tables. from religion to science. I have no clue how darwing came up with the theory. Did he made it up was he a known liar as history says he was? Or he had actual info. Were are his scientific journal proving his theory? If I was a scientist Ill bury the concept of God once and for all with tangible evidence.
Spectrum969 Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - No, Im supporting my argument that cells began complex.Like the human brain.
nomineZERO Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - LOL... Darwin had enough facts to come to the theory of evolution... The finches were the most interesting but there are also many others...
nomineZERO Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - "No, Im supporting my argument that cells began complex.Like the human brain."Wrong... The human brain is made out of milions of nerve cells, how can you say it began both that complex.Oh and there's another thing about evolution of the cell, well the RNA is evolutionarry older then the DNA... Actually the RNA would be some kind of first ancestors.
putrabite Says:
Oct 8, 2008 - explain to me, why human have two eyes 1 nose and 1 mouth, same with tiger, lion, wolf, even t-rex, stego, meganodon, shark, etc? even at the same position, eyes above the nose, mouth below the nose? think about it, is it the perfect position? is there some thing behind this fenomena, even the greates art people never put nose above the eyes, never put nose below the mouth in their masterpiece, think about this fenomena. i need some answer about this fenomena. THX :p
someoldguyfromkansas Says:
Oct 20, 2008 - phenomena NOT FENOMENA, THOUGH IT IS A VERY GOOD QUESTION... I HAVE NO IDEAgoddamn capslock
FattyBomBom12 Says:
Nov 29, 2008 - evolution.Things adapt to the environment and change to suit it over thousands of years.Both Predators and prey have eyes above the nose at the highest point at the head to look for danger or food...it gives them the best vantage point..If the nose was below the mouth it would get in the way of eating and so the animal has the mouth in the position that serves it best.as for artists..Picasso???
nomineZERO Says:
Sep 28, 2008 - "But as far you and I discussing EVO is pointless. I have a fact of faith you have theories.."Not true, actually I'm want to teach biology and evolution one day but till then I do it on youtube. But if you want it your way: You actually came explaining to me what evolution "really" is. And I've just corrected you as I saw that you just don't understand it, or that you have a false idea of it.
Home